|Articles, Services, & Free Guides|
|“The Food Lab”, International reports of radioactive food contamination.||International Radiation Monitoring Stations||Radio Interviews
|Free Geiger Counter Use Guide||Planetary Thermal Imbalance & UV levels|
|Local Background Radiation Monitoring Site||Free Personal Development Books||1: Crisis||Free DIY food testing lab guide||The Pacific Ocean Is Dying!|
by Peter Daley, 24th November 2015 (This page is updated as new reports arrive. You are welcome to copy, and use any of the information here.)
A lie is being perpetrated on the Internet that no radiation related fatalities have resulted from the ongoing Fukushima Nuclear Catastrophe. Anyone using any semblance of logic will know that this is fantasy! The evidence is overwhelming and clear, that large numbers of people have died, and more will die in the future as a result of this ongoing nuclear catastrophe!
Firstly we have this correspondence dated March 16th 2011 between the NRC and the Japanese. In this document the Japanese state 5 people having received lethal radiation doses. (Ninth bullet item down on the document screen shot.)
There are three nuclear core meltdowns at the Fukushima site, in China syndrome, with an underground river constantly following over them into the Pacific Ocean. The nuclear disaster in Japan is also much larger than the Fukushima site. The Japanese government admitted in May 2011 that there were a lot more nuclear reactors seriously damaged, not just those at the Fukushima Nuclear disaster site. We have no real information on what has been happening at those other nuclear disaster sites, because of the news blackout.
Quote from page 1 of this Presentation:
“According to Japan’s Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA), the earthquake and subsequent tsunami affected fourteen nuclear reactors at four sites along the eastern coast the Fukushima Daiichi site (six reactors), Fukushima Daini site (four reactors), the Ongawa site (three reactors) and the Tokai site (one reactor). The most serious damage occurred at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station.”
Note: There seems to be a document error here, as far as we know there are four reactors at Fukushima Daiichi site, and two reactors at the Fukushima Daini site.
Enenews: All of Western US and most of East Coast, Midwest, Canada covered with airborne particles at various altitudes on March 20, Fukushima plume model shows — Based solely on Reactor No. 1 explosion
Here are numerous reports, that are probably just the tip of the iceberg of fatalities and injuries resulting from this ongoing catastrophe!
19th July 2019 – “Oops”: Manipulated childhood cancer data hides radiation impact, harms public health protection
Mishandling of data misleads future research and jeopardizes public health.
FMU is keeping some primary clinical and demographic data hidden, even from the oversight committees, despite the committees’ repeated requests that these data be shared. FMU shares analytical results that are derived from this data but these results are often manipulated – such as with comparisons to data from Chernobyl data that have been misrepresented. At the most recent press conference, June 3, 2019, committee members were asked to grade the conclusions of their report based on the information provided by FMU. They graded the report reliability at under 60%, citing lack of dose information and missing cases.
FMU often uses methodologies for data analysis that are unclear, illogical, and therefore unable to be explained (Makino, in publication) much less replicated. Attempts to correct some of these shortcomings have not fully succeeded. Much of the data uncertainty is only discernible to those with Japanese language skills. The datasets have never been published in their entirety in Japanese and the fact that data are missing has never been officially disclosed in English.
We repeatedly see governments around the world, with a vested interest in nuclear power, do anything they can to cover up and play down the seriousness of any nuclear accident, even if the cover up leads to the death of large numbers of men, women and children.
7th January 2019 – The After Fukushima and Japan’s Declining Birthrate, Japan’s Demographics a National Crisis
From Chris Busby:
Japan’s birth rate was declining but gradually, as was the Belarus birthrate. The rate at which it was declining was low. Then after Fukushima it fell of the cliff.
I made this graph from Japan vital statistics data on the web.In 2005 it was 8.32. So there is a sharp fall in the rate after Fukushima. Same thing happened in Belarus after Chernobyl. Look at the Bandashevsky’s after Chernobyl birth rate graph.
It was expected What I am saying is that the fall in birthrate in Japan is a Fukushima effect in the same way as the fall in birthrate in Belrus was a Chernobyl effect.
The Japanese birthrate decline graph created by Chris Busby (link below), is an excellent educational tool to get the facts across to people about the real reason for the recent large Japanese population decline. This graph shows a much faster birthrate decline after 2011.